UNAT rejected the request for an oral hearing and the production of documents since there was no need for further clarification. UNAT held that the Appellant鈥檚 contentions regarding the application of the Palestinian Labour Law No. 7 (2000) and the UNRWA DT鈥檚 error in calculating the time limits were misconceived. UNAT held that, regarding the procedure and timeline involved in challenging administrative decisions, former UNWRA Area Staff Rule 111. 3, which was in effect at the material time when the Appellant鈥檚 contract as a teacher was terminated, was applicable. UNAT agreed with the...